Subscribe

GeopoliticsWorld and markets

Oil Prices Wait On Trump's Iran Choice

Oil and European gas rose on Nov. 4 as traders judged whether the president pursues diplomacy or renewed strikes on Iran after the midterms.

Oil rose on Nov. 4 as investors gauged how the midterm results could shape President Trump's approach to Iran, while high energy prices continue to fuel inflation and weigh on consumers, the Wall Street Journal reported. European natural gas rose after the elections as traders waited to learn whether the president will pursue diplomacy or launch renewed military action. The transmission channel is direct: Iran's position on the Strait of Hormuz sets freight and insurance costs for oil headed to Asia and Europe.

The Journal reported on Nov. 3 that Iran is turning to guerrilla tactics, from rocket-propelled grenades to limpet mines, in a bid to reassert its grip on the strait and disrupt the restored flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf. That detail explains why oil is sensitive to politics: the flow has been restored, so the market is pricing the risk of losing it again. Tuesday's stock market closed with trepidation over election results and skepticism about a near-term resolution to the war.

Energy prices feed straight into the rates picture. Euro zone inflation rose for a fourth straight month to a three-year high, driven by energy costs, and the ECB may hike again. In the U.S., the Journal says high energy costs weigh on consumers. The equity market gave a mixed reading on Tuesday: energy stocks fell 0.81% while oil prices were rising, which suggests investors do not expect the elevated price to last, or that the sector was caught in a broader selloff.

The skeptical read is that the market is pricing a binary outcome with no data on which branch is more likely. The brief contains no statement from the administration on its post-election intentions, only traders' speculation. Democratic gains in Congress may constrain war powers or spending, but the data does not say so. What the market has are two bad choices for energy consumers: renewed strikes that raise the risk to Hormuz shipping, or diplomacy that has not yet produced a resolution.

For today, the signals to watch are oil and European gas at the open, and any statement from the White House on Iran policy. Venezuela's oil exports were unchanged amid stagnant output and high freight rates, per Reuters on Nov. 3, so there is no spare supply response from there. Rare earth supply is a secondary channel, with a proposed Utah processing facility aimed at China dependence. India's MRPL has raised its delivered oil buying, which shows refiners already adapting to shipping risk.

More from the Geopolitics desk

Iran's Guerrilla Campaign In Hormuz

The Wall Street Journal reported on Nov. 3 that Tehran is deploying rocket-propelled grenades and limpet mines in an attempt to reassert its grip on the Strait of Hormuz and disrupt the restored flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf. The tactics are low-cost and hard to defend against compared with conventional naval confrontation. Their effect is to raise the perceived risk of each tanker passage, even if few ships are hit.

For markets the transmission is through insurance and freight rather than through lost barrels. High freight rates are already cited in Reuters' account of Venezuelan exports. The lesson of an asymmetric campaign is that the price effect can outrun the physical effect: oil can rise on a threat that disrupts little. That makes the price a measure of fear, which is why headlines about the president's next move carry weight.

India's MRPL Buys Oil Delivered

Reuters reported on Nov. 4 that India's Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals, MRPL, is boosting its purchases of delivered oil as the Iran war raises shipping risks. Buying on a delivered basis means the seller carries the cargo's transit risk, so the refiner is paying a premium to remove exposure to Gulf shipping disruption. It is a small decision that shows how the risk is being priced into physical trade, not only into futures.

Seller-arranged freight shifts risk to suppliers and shipping firms, which can be passed on in price. High freight rates are the other half of the story, with Venezuela's exports stagnant for the same reason. The data does not give MRPL's volumes or the premium it is paying. What it does show is that buyers are choosing certainty over cost, a behaviour that tends to keep physical oil premiums elevated even when futures are calm.

European Gas Awaits The Post-Midterm Move

European natural gas prices rose after the U.S. midterm elections, the Wall Street Journal said on Nov. 4, as traders waited to see whether President Trump will pursue diplomacy with Iran or launch renewed strikes. Europe's exposure runs through liquefied natural gas supply that depends on Gulf shipping and global competition for cargoes, so a Middle East escalation lifts the continent's gas costs directly.

Gas is the energy price most visible in euro zone inflation, which rose for a fourth consecutive month to a three-year high. That ties a diplomatic decision in Washington to the European Central Bank's next rate move. The Journal says traders are waiting rather than positioning, which means the price carries a risk premium without a firm view. A decisive step in either direction would likely move the gas market quickly.

Utah Rare Earths Plant Gets A Term Sheet

REalloys Inc. signed a non-binding term sheet to develop a rare earth processing facility at Tooele Army Depot in Utah, Fox Business reported Nov. 3, with the goal of reducing U.S. reliance on China for critical minerals. The word non-binding carries weight: nothing in the data suggests financing, a construction schedule or an offtake customer. It is an intention, not a project.

The strategic logic is real. Processing, not mining, is the bottleneck in rare earths, and China dominates it. A facility on an Army depot signals defence interest in domestic supply. Yet the data gives no capacity, cost or timeline, so the announcement cannot yet be valued. Basic materials was the weakest sector on Tuesday, down 1.45%, which shows the equity market is not rewarding the theme in aggregate.

By the numbers

Also in this edition

Get tomorrow's edition by email. Free, one each morning.